Rhode Island
Lawmakers Approve Civil Unions
Published: June 29, 2011 - New York Times
PROVIDENCE, R.I. — Less than a week after same-sex
marriage was legalized in New York, the Rhode Island State Senate on
Wednesday evening approved a bill allowing not marriage, but civil unions for
gay couples, despite fierce opposition from gay-rights advocates who called the
legislation discriminatory.
The bill, which already passed in the statefs House of Representatives and
which the governor said he was likely to sign, would grant gay and lesbian
couples most of the rights and benefits that Rhode Island provides married
couples. It was offered as a compromise this spring after Gordon D. Fox, the
openly gay speaker of the Democratic-controlled House, said he could not muster
enough votes to pass a same-sex marriage bill.
Gay marriage advocates initially had high hopes for success in Rhode Island
this year. The new governor, Lincoln D. Chafee, an independent, had championed
their cause, and Mr. Fox, who became speaker last year, also appeared eager to
get a marriage bill passed. The statefs two closest neighbors, Connecticut and
Massachusetts, allow gay couples to marry, as do New Hampshire and Vermont.
But M. Teresa Paiva Weed, a Democrat and the State Senate president, opposes
gay marriage, and Mr. Fox ultimately threw his support to civil unions instead,
saying that was a more realistic goal.
Gay rights advocates say the bill is unacceptable because it allows religious
organizations to not recognize the unions. For example, they say, a Catholic
hospital could choose not to allow a lesbian to make medical decisions on behalf
of her partner, and a Catholic university could deny family medical leave to gay
employees.
gItfs a permission slip to ignore legal obligations,h said Karen L. Loewy, a
lawyer at Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, or GLAD.
Some opponents of same-sex marriage, including the Roman Catholic Church, are
also against the civil unions bill. But Ms. Paiva Weed said she saw it as a
worthy compromise.
gWe have moved one step in the right direction toward ensuring that
individuals receive equal rights and protections under the law,h Ms. Paiva Weed
said before the Senate Judiciary Committee approved the bill Wednesday
afternoon.
After the committee vote, Ms. Paiva Weed said that she did not expect the
Legislature to vote on a same-sex marriage bill next year, either.
Mr. Chafee told reporters Wednesday that he would probably sign the bill even
though he thought the religious protections were overly broad.
gWefre taking incremental steps forward as other states have,h he said. gWe
want to get on the path to full equality and this is a step on the path.h
The bill provides for hospital visitations, joint bank accounts and property
transfers, among other rights. If Mr. Chafee signs it, Rhode Island will become
the fifth state with a civil unions law; Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois and New
Jersey already allow civil unions for gay couples.
New York passed its same-sex marriage law last week, joining the District of
Columbia and five other states — Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire
and Vermont. In Connecticut, New Hampshire and Vermont, civil union laws were
stepping stones to gay marriage laws. But gay rights advocates increasingly say
that civil unions are not an acceptable alternative.
gYoufre never going to see us trumpet civil unions,h said Ray Sullivan,
campaign director for Marriage Equality Rhode Island, the group that has led the
push for same-sex marriage here. gWe believe civil unions establish a
second-class citizenry.h
Some advocates expressed disappointment in Mr. Chafee for not pushing harder
for gay marriage. But they acknowledged that he was handicapped as a new
governor with no party affiliation and thus less clout with the Democratic
leaders of his Legislature than, say, Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York.
gItfs abundantly clear that with Governor Cuomo, there was incredible
coordination and motivation at the top,h Ms. Loewy said. gBut Ifm not sure that
Chafee had the ability to play the same role that Cuomo did.h
In an interview, Mr. Chafee said Rhode Islandfs large elderly and Catholic
populations helped explain why same-sex marriage has not gained traction.
gTheyfre very strong,h he said. gThe church has been very active in calling
the Legislature.h
Christopher Plante, executive director of the Rhode Island chapter of the
National Organization for Marriage, which opposes same-sex marriage and civil
unions, said the bill had gopened the door for the courts of Rhode Island to
redefine marriage without a vote of the people.h gThis is a disappointing and
dangerous day,h he said.
Mr. Sullivan said Marriage Equality Rhode Island had planned to remain
neutral on the civil unions bill but came out against it after the gdraconianh
religious protections were added. Most civil union and gay marriage bills offer
some religious protections — allowing a minister not to perform a gay marriage
ceremony if he so chooses, for example — but the Rhode Island bill goes much
further, Mr. Sullivan said.
gWe support common-sense exemptions,h he said. gBut no government should ever
grant a religion or organization the autonomous authority to operate outside the
boundaries of the law.h
Timothy Williams contributed reporting from New
York.